[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Ethics::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Index










     
 
..
:: Volume 27, Issue 1 (3-2025) ::
EBNESINA 2025, 27(1): 37-49 Back to browse issues page
The effect of group cognitive behavior therapy on aggression, social adjustment, and and peer interaction in male elementary school students
Narjes Taslimi , Saeid Yazdi-Ravandi *
Behavioral Disorders and Substance Abuse Research Center, Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , yazdiravandi@umsha.ac.ir
Keywords: cognitive therapy, aggression, social adjustment, social interaction, male, students, school
Full-Text [PDF 1910 kb]   (155 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (555 Views)
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Military Psychiatry
Received: 2025/02/3 | Revised: 2025/03/15 | Accepted: 2025/03/16 | Published: 2025/04/5
Extended Abstract:   (249 Views)

Introduction

Children are the future hopes and assets of society. The unique role this group plays in the growth, development, and progress of a country is well recognized. Given that a large number of children and teenagers attend schools, achieving educational goals becomes challenging when inconsistencies and behavioral problems arise. One behavioral problem with alarmingly high prevalence is aggression. Uncontrolled anger often leads to aggression and incompatibility [1].
Adaptability is considered a key characteristic that fundamentally supports both mental and physical health. It is a psychological process through which individuals cope with desires and challenges, managing daily life problems or bringing them under control. Low levels of social adaptability in students who face difficulties in social interactions often result in problems communicating with others, negatively impacting social relationships and self-empowerment. There is concern that these issues contribute to social, psychological, and academic problems in students. Self-empowerment plays a critical role in confronting these challenges. Many discussions emphasize that schools have an important role in students’ cognitive and social development.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on aggression, social adjustment, and peer interaction in male elementary school students.

Methods

This semi-experimental study employed a pre-test-post-test design. The research sample consisted of 30 male students in grades five and six from a School in Fasa city during the 2023-2024 academic year.
The participants were selected based on availability, ethical considerations, and the informed consent. The students was randomly divided into two groups: 15 in the experimental group and 15 in the control group.
Participants completed the following measurement tools before and after the intervention:
Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ): Originally containing 52 questions, this scale was refined to 29 items via factor analysis, assessing four components of aggression: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility, as well as overall aggression levels [12].
Bell's Emotional Adjustment Questionnaire (1961): With 160 questions covering social, emotional, health, family, and occupational adjustment, this study used the emotional adjustment subscale [13].
Hudson Peer Interaction Questionnaire (IPR): Developed by Wabater Debilo Hudson in 1992, this 25-item scale evaluates peer relationships and participation [14].
CBT is an effective and scientifically validated treatment. Its dual cognitive-behavioral approach has demonstrated high efficacy for participants [16]. In this study, CBT techniques were delivered over thirteen 60-minute group sessions, following the protocol used by Zarei et al. [17].
After sampling, the control group received no training. The experimental group participated in CBT group sessions twice weekly, each lasting 60 minutes, for 13 sessions. Post-tests were conducted for both groups. The research took place from early November to late December 2023.

Results

The control group’s average social adjustment score was 15.98 in the pre-test and 16.06 post-test. The experimental group’s social adjustment score decreased from 16.81 to 12.53. Aggression scores in the control group dropped from 80.33 to 79.73, while in the experimental group they decreased significantly from 79.01 to 63.80. Peer relationship scores in the control group slightly decreased from 76.13 to 75.62, whereas in the experimental group they dropped from 76.47 to 58.39.
Covariance analysis showed significant effects of CBT on all dependent variables:
Social Adjustment: (p < 0.001, F = 19.17), with CBT explaining 43% of variance. Aggression: (p < 0.001, F = 21.18), with 45% of variance explained by CBT. Peer Relationships: (p < 0.001, F = 37.76), with 60% effect size.

Discussion and Conclusion

This study demonstrated that CBT significantly reduces aggression, improves social adjustment, and enhances peer relationships among male elementary school students. CBT helps children regulate emotions better and select peaceful conflict resolution strategies instead of aggressive responses. Participants notably improved their social skills, communication abilities, and self-confidence, making them more comfortable and adaptable in social settings [18­21]. Overall, CBT’s focus on modifying cognitive and behavioral patterns supports children’s developmental growth and promotes positive social engagement within school environments.

Ethical Considerations

This research adhered to ethical standards including: obtaining research permission from the relevant university and coordinating with the Fasa Education Organization, ensuring confidentiality of questionnaire data, receiving informed consent from students and their parents, and making the final results available to participants upon request.
Approval for the research protocol was granted by the Research Ethics Committees of Islamic Azad University-Hamedan Branch, under the ethical code IR.IAU.H.REC.1403.047.

Funding

There is no funding support.

Authors’ Contribution

The first author performed data collection and study execution as part of her clinical psychology master’s thesis. The second author is responsible for initial design, study guidance, expert advice, and editing. Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support of Fasa city education authorities and the staff at Shahid Hekmat Kamal School, as well as the cooperation of all research participants.
 
References
1. Mohammadi A, Kahnamouei SB, Allahvirdiyan K, Habibzadeh S. The effect of anger management training on aggression and social adjustment of male students aged 12-15 of shabestar schools in 2008. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;5:1690-1693. doi:10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2010.07.347
2. Chen J-C, Silverthorne C. The impact of locus of control on job stress, job performance and job satisfaction in Taiwan. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2008;29(7):572-582. doi:10.1108/01437730810906326
3. Babakhani V. The effectiveness of mindfulness skills training on adjustment and mental health of students. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ). 2019;8(5):171-178. [Persian]
4. Christoforou R, Lange S, Schweiker M. Individual differences in the definitions of health and well-being and the underlying promotional effect of the built environment. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024;84:108560. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108560
5. Ghorbandordinejad F, Farjad Nasab AH. Examination of the relationship between perfectionism and English achievement as mediated by foreign language classroom anxiety. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2013;14(4):603-614. doi:10.1007/s12564-013-9286-5
6. Petry K, Maes B, Vlaskamp C. Domains of quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities: The perspective of parents and direct support staff. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2005;18:35-46. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00209.x
7. Gifford-Smith M, Dodge KA, Dishion TJ, McCord J. Peer influence in children and adolescents: crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Pychology. 2005;33(3):255-265. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-3563-7
8. Blackwell Simon E, Heidenreich Thomas. Cognitive Behavior Therapy at the Crossroads. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2021;14(1):1-22. doi:10.1007/s41811-021-00104-y
9. Abedi H, Matinnia N, Yazdi-Ravandi S. Investigating the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group therapy on psycho-social and emotional adaptability and cognitive flexibility in people with multiple sclerosis in Hamedan, Iran. Neurol Sci. 2023;44(12):4421-4428. doi:10.1007/s10072-023-06953-z
10. Azami E, Haj Sadeghi Z, Yazdi Ravandi S. The comparative study of effectiveness of training communication and emotional skills on parenting stress of mothers with autism children. Zanko Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017;18(56):1-11.
11. Pourehsan S, Falsafinejad M, Delavar A, Farokhi N, Borjali A. Application of multi- level approach in detemining the role of inefficient metacognitive componenets on the tendency of school students to drug abuse. Quarterly of Educational Measurement. 2018;9(32):1-15. doi:10.22054/jem.2019.6811.1226
12. Buss AH, Perry M. The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;63(3):452-459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
13. Asadi M, Yoosefi S. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the machiavellian personality scale and its association with social adjustment and risky behaviors in Iranian college students. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):693. doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05177-x
14. Rahdar M, Seydi MS, rashidi a. Path analysis of family leisure to social development by mediating the quality of Parent-Adolescent communication and the quality of Relationships with Peers. Social Psychology Research. 2020;10(37):29-44. [Persian] doi:10.22034/spr.2020.109695
15. James AC, Reardon T, Soler A, James G, Creswell C. Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020;11(11):Cd013162. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013162.pub2
16. Ravanbakhsh LU, Ebrahimi MIU, Haddadi AU, Yazdi-Ravandi SU. Effects of the acceptance and commitment therapy on resiliency, self-compassion, and corona disease anxiety on medical staff involved in COVID-19 pandemic. IJ Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2023;17(4):e136845. doi:10.5812/ijpbs-136845
17. Zareie Faskhudi B, Karbalaee Mohammad Meigouni A, Rezabakhsh H, Ghelichi L. Comparison of the effect of unified transdiagnostic treatment from emotional disorders and emotion efficacy therapy on emotion regulation among adults with stuttering. Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 2021;12(2):185-209. [Persian] doi:10.22059/japr.2021.312232.643672
18. Fordham B, Sugavanam T, Edwards K, Hemming K, Howick J, Copsey B, et al. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis. Health Technology Assessment 2021;25(9):1-378. doi:10.3310/hta25090
19. Atadokht A, Masoumeh GB, Mikaeli N, Samadifard HR. Effect of emotion-focused cognitive behavioral therapy on social adjustment and experiential avoidance in iranian disabled veterans. Military Caring Sciences. 2019;6(3):176-186. [Persian] doi:10.29252/mcs.6.3.3
20. Bru L, Roar S, and Idsoe T. Participants’ experiences of an early cognitive behavioral intervention for adolescents with symptoms of depression. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. 2013;18(1):24-43. doi:10.1080/13632752.2012.675138
21. Shirkhanzadeh M, Hatami M, Sarami Foroushani G, Ahadi H. The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy on psychological distress in people with bulimia nervosa. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022;29(10):1-9. [Persian]
22. Ashori M, Ghasemzadeh S, Dallalzadeh Bidgoli F. The impact of play therapy based on cognitive-behavioral model on the social skills of preschool children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health. 2019;6(2):27-39. [Persian] doi:10.29252/jcmh.6.2.4
23. Jalali Azar R, Ebrahimi MI, Haddadi A, Yazdi-Ravandi S. The impact of acceptance and commitment therapy on college students’ suicidal ideations, a tendency to self-harm, and existential anxiety. Current Psychology. 2024;43(17):15649-15658. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-05501-4
24. Jafari N, Mohammadi MR, Khanbani M, Farid S, Chiti P. Effect of play therapy on behavioral problems of maladjusted preschool children. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;6(1):37-42.
25. Sadipour E, Dortaj F, Hojati M. The effect of cognitive-behavioral game therapy on the social skills and adaptation of mentally retarded female elementary school students in Najaf Abad city. Applied Research in Consulting. 2019;2(1):107-134. [Persian]
26. Sukhodolsky DG, Smith SD, McCauley SA, Ibrahim K, Piasecka JB. Behavioral Interventions for Anger, Irritability, and Aggression in Children and Adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 2016;26(1):58-64. doi:10.1089/cap.2015.0120
27. Sukhodolsky DG, Golub A, Stone E, Orban L. Dismantling anger control training for children: A randomized pilot study of social problem-solving versus social skills training components. Behavior Therapy. 2005;36:15-23. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80050-4
28. Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Rsearch. 2012;36(5):427-440. doi:10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1
29. Rohrbeck CA, Gray LS. Peer relationships: Promoting positive peer relationships during childhood. In: Gullotta TP, Bloom M, eds. Encyclopedia of primary prevention and health promotion. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2014:828-836. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5999-6_137
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

Ethics code: IR.IAU.H.REC.1403.047



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Taslimi N, Yazdi-Ravandi S. The effect of group cognitive behavior therapy on aggression, social adjustment, and and peer interaction in male elementary school students. EBNESINA 2025; 27 (1) :37-49
URL: http://ebnesina.ajaums.ac.ir/article-1-1386-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 27, Issue 1 (3-2025) Back to browse issues page
ابن سینا EBNESINA
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714