[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Ethics::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Index










     
 
..
:: Volume 27, Issue 2 (7-2025) ::
EBNESINA 2025, 27(2): 79-92 Back to browse issues page
Effects of a nordic walking program on balance, cognitive function, and mobility in elderly women with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial protocol
Susan Panjalizad , Farzaneh Gandomi * , Parviz Sofivand
Departement of Sport Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Sport Sciences Faculty, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran , gandomi777@gmail.com
Keywords: knee osteoarthritis, Nordic walking, pain, posture balance, cognitive function
Full-Text [PDF 1754 kb]   (65 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (163 Views)
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Military Psychiatry
Received: 2025/01/11 | Revised: 2025/09/29 | Accepted: 2025/06/29 | Published: 2025/07/2
Extended Abstract:   (15 Views)

Introduction

Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of chronic joint pain and disability, significantly impacting the quality of life for millions of individuals worldwide [1]. This degenerative joint disease is characterized by the progressive destruction of articular cartilage, a condition that worsens with age, leading to increased pain, stiffness, and functional limitations [2]. As the global population ages, the prevalence of knee osteoarthritis continues to rise, making it a pressing public health concern. In light of this, there is a growing need to develop and implement non-invasive, cost-effective strategies to manage symptoms and improve the overall well-being of affected individuals.
One such strategy is regular physical activity, which has been shown to enhance both physical and mental health in patients with knee osteoarthritis [7]. While pharmacological treatments can provide short-term relief, they are often expensive and may come with undesirable side effects. In contrast, non-drug interventions, such as exercise and muscle-strengthening programs, are increasingly recommended for their long-term benefits in managing pain, fatigue, and functional decline associated with the disease [7]. Among these interventions, walking has emerged as a particularly accessible and effective form of exercise.
Recently, Nordic walking has gained attention as a promising alternative to traditional walking for individuals with knee osteoarthritis [9]. This form of walking involves the use of lightweight poles, which are employed to enhance lower limb mobility and distribute weight more evenly across the body. Research indicates that Nordic walking results in a 22% higher energy expenditure compared to regular walking, which may contribute to weight loss—a key factor in reducing the burden on affected joints [11]. Additionally, the use of poles provides added stability, increasing confidence in knee joint function and improving overall balance. These benefits suggest that Nordic walking could be more effective than conventional walking, which is already widely recommended as a routine exercise for older adults. The potential of Nordic walking to mitigate the complications of knee osteoarthritis warrants further investigation.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of Nordic walking and regular walking on pain, balance, cognitive function, and disability in middle-aged women with knee osteoarthritis. By examining these outcomes, we aim to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing exercise interventions in this population.

Methods

The present study is designed as a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial with a pretest-posttest, parallel-group structure. A total of 45 eligible women will be recruited, meeting specific inclusion criteria based on clinical and radiological assessments. These criteria include a score of II or lower on the Kallgren and Lawer scale, morning stiffness and dryness, chronic knee pain persisting for at least three months, and a pain score of at least 4 on the visual analog scale. Participants must also exhibit joint space narrowing or osteophytes on radiographs and fall within the age range of 45 to 65 years [9]. Exclusion criteria include uncontrolled diabetes, a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m² or higher, a history of knee surgery, orthopedic injuries in the lower limbs, or neuromuscular disorders [16, 17].
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: Nordic walking (n = 15), regular walking (n = 15), and a control group (n = 15). The experimental groups will undergo a six-week intervention consisting of three 60-minute sessions per week, conducted in a park environment to simulate real-world conditions. The control group will not engage in any structured exercise during the study period but will be offered the opportunity to participate in Nordic walking sessions after the study concludes [9]. The key distinction between the Nordic walking and regular walking programs lies in the use of poles. The Nordic walking poles are adjustable, with lengths ranging from 79 cm to 135 cm, and feature an I-shaped design [9].
The primary outcome of this study is pain, which will be assessed using the McGill Pain Index. Secondary outcomes include balance, measured with the Technobody device; muscle strength, evaluated using a dynamometer; proprioception, assessed with an inclinometer; and motor function, tested via the Womack, three-meter, and 4-meter walk tests. Cognitive function will be measured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) questionnaire, while quality of life will be evaluated using the Osteoarthritis Knee and Hip Quality of Life (OAKHQoL) questionnaire. Additionally, the risk of falls will be determined using the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) questionnaire, developed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Data analysis will be performed using SPSS version 25 software. Assuming a normal distribution of data, a two-way ANOVA test will be employed to examine within-group (time) and between-group (intervention type) effects. The study design follows a 3x2 framework, with three groups and two time points (pretest and posttest). If a significant interaction effect is detected, paired t-tests will be used to analyze within-group changes, while one-way ANOVA tests will assess between-group differences. Sample size calculations were conducted using G*Power software version 1.3, with an alpha level of 0.05, statistical power of 0.80, and an estimated effect size of 0.5 for pain and function [5]. Based on these parameters, a sample size of 42 participants was determined, which was increased to 45 to account for a potential 5% dropout rate.

Discussion and Conclusion

In recent years, the World Health Organization has revised its physical activity guidelines to reflect the growing emphasis on maintaining health through dynamic, enjoyable activities such as walking [9]. Extensive evidence supports the role of walking programs in preserving and enhancing health, particularly for individuals with chronic conditions like knee osteoarthritis [10]. Emerging research suggests that Nordic walking may offer additional benefits, including improved quality of life and greater engagement due to its enjoyable and low-cost nature. This study seeks to explore whether Nordic walking can serve as an effective, accessible, and sustainable intervention for middle-aged women with knee osteoarthritis, potentially surpassing the benefits of traditional walking.

Ethical Considerations

This study protocol has undergone rigorous review and approval by the Ethics Committee for Biological Research at Razi University (approval number IR.RAZI.REC.1403.031). Additionally, the Iranian Clinical Trials Center has evaluated and approved the study (IRCT20241027063512N1). Participation in the study is entirely voluntary, and all participants will provide informed consent before enrollment. Ethical considerations, including participant confidentiality and the right to withdraw at any time, have been prioritized throughout the study design.

Funding

There is no funding support.

Authors’ Contribution

Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the research team and the dedicated members of the executive and administrative groups at Razi University for their efforts.
 
References
1. Ahn H, Zhong C, Miao H, Chaoul A, Park L, Yen IH, et al. Efficacy of combining home-based transcranial direct current stimulation with mindfulness-based meditation for pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2019;70:140-145. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.047
2. Ferreira RM, Martins PN, Gonçalves RS. Non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions to manage patients with knee osteoarthritis: An umbrella review 5-year update. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open. 2024;6(3):100497. doi:10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100497
3. Kim DJ. A study on the physical activities, mental health, and health-related quality of life of osteoarthritis patients. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives. 2019;10(6):368-375. doi:10.24171/j.phrp.2019.10.6.07
4. Kato N, Fukusaki C, Leetawesup K, Kadokura Y, Ishii N. Improvement in gait asymmetry during Nordic walking in patients with lower extremity osteoarthritis. The Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine. 2020;9:65-73. doi:10.7600/jpfsm.9.65
5. Raposo F, Ramos M, Lúcia Cruz A. Effects of exercise on knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care. 2021;19(4):399-435. doi:10.1002/msc.1538
6. Addissouky T, Sayed I, Ali M. Conservative and emerging rehabilitative approaches for knee osteoarthritis management. Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Care. 2024;6(2):1-11. doi:10.31579/2694-0248/082
7. González-Devesa D, Varela S, Sanchez-Lastra M, Ayán C. Nordic walking as a non-pharmacological intervention for chronic pain and fatigue: Systematic review. Healthcare. 2024;12(12):1167. doi:10.3390/healthcare12121167
8. Liu Y, Xie W, Ossowski Z. The effects of Nordic Walking on health in adults: A systematic review. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2022;13(1):188-196. doi:10.12775/JEHS.2023.13.01.028
9. Song MS, Yoo YK, Choi CH, Kim NC. Effects of nordic walking on body composition, muscle strength, and lipid profile in elderly women. Asian Nursing Research. 2013;7(1):1-7. doi:10.1016/j.anr.2012.11.001
10. Ben Mansour K, Gorce P, Rezzoug N. The impact of Nordic walking training on the gait of the elderly. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2018;36(20):2368-2374. doi:10.1080/02640414.2018.1458396
11. Jurikova J, Kyzlink J. Benefits of nordic walking. Discobolul-Physical Education, Sport & Kinetotherapy Journal. 2020;59:484-495. doi:10.35189/dpeskj.2020.59.s.1
12. Silverberg D, Goodman C, Prejserowicz A. The effect of nordic pole walking on chronic low back, hip, and/or knee pain on walking and on distance walked-a prospective community study in ambulatory people over age 60. International Journal of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation 2016;2(10.15344):1-5. doi:10.15344/2455-7498/2016/12
13. Bieler T, Magnusson SP, Kjaer M, Beyer N. SAT0451 supervised strength training, NORDIC Walking or unsupervised home based exercise in older people with hip osteoarthritis? A randomized trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014;73(Suppl 2):757. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2360
14. Choi J. Effects of nordic walking to walking on muscle strength in patient with arthritis. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017;10(7):2375-2378. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00420.6
15. Gmiąt A, Jaworska J, Micielska K, Kortas J, Prusik K, Prusik K, et al. Improvement of cognitive functions in response to a regular Nordic walking training in elderly women - A change dependent on the training experience. Experimental Gerontology. 2018;104:105-112. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2018.02.006
16. Li E, Tan J, Xu K, Pan Y, Xu P. Global burden and socioeconomic impact of knee osteoarthritis: a comprehensive analysis. Frontiers in Medicine. 2024;11:1323091. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1323091
17. Ren X, Lutter C, Kebbach M, Bruhn S, Yang Q, Bader R, Tischer T. Compensatory responses during slip-induced perturbation in patients with knee osteoarthritis compared with healthy older adults: An increased risk of falls? Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2022;10:893840. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.893840
18. Kawano MM, Araújo IL, Castro MC, Matos MA. Assessment of quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Acta Ortopedica Brasileira. 2015;23(6):307-310. doi:10.1590/1413-785220152306150596
19. Ge L, Yu Q, Wang C, Huang H, Li X, Zhang S, Zhang S. How cognitive loads modulate the postural control of older women with low back pain? BMC Geriatrics. 2021;21(1):82. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02025-z
20. Dumanlidağ S, Milanlioğlu A. Comparison of static and dynamic balance measurements among chronic and episodic migraine patients. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2021;79(5):399-406. doi:10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2020-0319
21. Sharif A, Amjad F, Arslan SA, Ahmad A. Translation and validation of urdu version short form-mcgill pain questionnaire-2. BMC Sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2023;15(1):102. doi:10.1186/s13102-023-00715-2
22. Lafontant K, Blount A, Suarez JRM, Fukuda DH, Stout JR, Trahan EM, et al. Comparing sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fall risk assessments in community-dwelling older adults. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2024;19:581-588. doi:10.2147/cia.S453966
23. Kim MJ, Kang BH, Park SH, Kim B, Lee GY, Seo YM, et al. Association of the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) with muscle strength in community-dwelling elderly with knee osteoarthritis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(7). doi:10.3390/ijerph17072260
24. Torre MM, Carrubba C, Langeard A, Hugues N, Laurin J, Temprado JJ. Is an 8-week regimen of nordic walking training sufficient to benefit cognitive performance in healthy older adults? A pilot study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(5):1235. doi:10.3390/jcm13051235
25. Brennecke AB, Barreto ESR, Lins-Kusterer L, Maria Torres de Araujo Azi L, Kraychete D. Impact of different treatments for chronic pain on cognitive function: A systematic review. British Journal of Pain. 2025;19(3):20494637241311784. doi:10.1177/20494637241311784
26. Carvalho CM, de Andrade KR, Poltronieri BC, de Oliveira YG, Ferreira RG, Woodruff E, Panizzutti R. Translation and validation of the audiovisual version of the Montreal cognitive assessment in older adults in Brazil. BMC Geriatrics. 2024;24(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12877-023-04553-2
27. Muff G, Dufour S, Meyer A, Severac F, Favret F, Geny B, et al. Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2016;28(9):2445-2451. doi:10.1589/jpts.28.2445
28. Seko T, Mori M, Ohnishi H, Himuro N, Takahashi Y, Kumamoto T, Ito T. Reliability and validity of seated hip extensor strength measurement by handheld dynamometer in older adults. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. 2019;42(4):E39-e44. doi:10.1519/jpt.0000000000000207
29. Jamali N, Khayambashi K, Lenjannejadian S, Esmaeili H. Effect of hip abductor and external rotator muscles strengthening on pain, hip muscles strength, and lower extremity kinematics in patients with patellofemoral pain. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020;9(2):79-92. [Persian] doi:10.22037/jrm.2019.112374.2186
30. Baert IAC, Lluch E, Struyf T, Peeters G, Van Oosterwijck S, Tuynman J, et al. Inter- and intrarater reliability of two proprioception tests using clinical applicable measurement tools in subjects with and without knee osteoarthritis. Musculoskeletal Science & Practice. 2018;35:105-109. doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2017.11.011
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

Ethics code: IR.RAZI.REC.1403.031
Clinical trials code: IRCT20241027063512N1



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Panjalizad S, Gandomi F, Sofivand P. Effects of a nordic walking program on balance, cognitive function, and mobility in elderly women with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial protocol. EBNESINA 2025; 27 (2) :79-92
URL: http://ebnesina.ajaums.ac.ir/article-1-1381-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 27, Issue 2 (7-2025) Back to browse issues page
ابن سینا EBNESINA
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4722